|
|
|
||
Getting a
good voiceover seems to be a mystery for some digital storytellers. This
spawns from a wide variety of reasons that can usually be narrowed down to
three basic issues;
A good voiceover recording doesn't require that you have expensive gear or a super-well designed recording room, nor does it require a tremendous amount of schooling to achieve. Common sense, a little effort, and a trained ear are necessary, and everything else is gravy. Is it easier to get a great V/O sound with good equipment? Absolutely. If you plan on doing a lot of V/O work, you should be planning on spending a little cash to make your life easier.The front end of the system is by far the most important aspect of the recording process in today's world, and I'll touch on this later in the article. First considerations for a good voiceover is to pay attention to the room or environment in which you'll be recording the V/O. Look for the following; Noise sources such as computers, air vents, windows exposed to streets, kids playing upstairs, (This is where the Big Little Feet Studio got its name) noise from any other source such as a television in the next room, flourescent light ballast buzz, etc. Stand in the center of the room, close your eyes and really LISTEN to the room. Dismiss all sounds from your mind except the room and find the problems. If you have none, be surprised, because that's fairly unusual except in professionally designed or well-thought out rooms. Clap your hands and listen to the way the audio bounces back at you. If it bounces back at all, your room is going to require treatment at some level. It could be minimal, it could be a major reconstruct, depending on your desires and needs. Reflections are your enemy. Is the room comfortable, lending itself to a sense of relaxation, inspiration, and enery? This is much more important that many recordists first starting out might consider. You can always eliminate some of these concerns by simply building a voice-over box/booth such as the instructions found here. You can also access great rooms from companies like Whisper, or use treatment applications from manufacturers like Auralex. Next, we need to examine our front end. The front end means the acquisition tools used to record the audio. Are you using a digital system or an analog system? For purposes of this discussion, we'll only be talking about digital systems whether they be dedicated hard disk solutions, DAT, or a software/HDD based system. In this event, recording noise is not an issue at all, as digital on its own isn't noisy, but the tools used to convert the analog sound into a digital sound may be.
Microphones for V/O come in a lot of different styles, brands, and formats. While large diaphragm mics are often considered the "standard" of the industry, there are many unique opportunties out there that are oft-overlooked. As an example, There are some small diaphragm mics such as the AT 4053 that are great, and there are shotgun microphones that are often used to create the tight, narrow but pushed sound of many of todays voiceover artists. Cheaper mics, such as the Shure SM-58 are quite usable as well, but they'll require more work in post-production than one of the better mics. This is one of the tradeoffs of not spending a little money up front; you either pay in cash, or you pay in time. Choose wisely, because if you're doing a lot of voiceover work with a cheap microphone, then you're spending a lot more time in post tweaking that sound, but if you purchase a more expensive microphone that's closer to your desired sound, you will spend less tweak-time. How much is your time worth? Only you can answer that. There are many opinions on what microphones should and shouldn't be used for voiceover work. Ignore most of them and spend a little time trying a variety of microphones with YOUR voice or the voice of your talent. Find an audio supplier that allows you to monitor microphones either through headphones or speaker monitors. Monitors are best, if they're in a good room without a lot of noise. Most professional shops will have some sort of arrangement for this. Mics to look at as a starter might be:
Next let's examine the preamp and/or digital audio converter. Sometimes, these are one and the same. The preamplifier provides a step between the mic and the recording medium, necessary to raise output while not incurring noise. Some systems have a preamplifier built into the same device as the analog to digital converter, such as the M-Audio Firewire 410 or the EchoFire 8, and even the new Mackie Onyx series mixing consoles have a great sound, providing preamps, EQ, and other standard mixing functions while acting as an interface with the Apple or PC computer. Only Apogee has a super high end input pre with a DAC (Digital Audio Converter) but the devices mentioned above are very, very good. Emu Systems (Creative Labs) just announced and is shipping a new sound card that appears to be promising. Look for a device that manages at least 24 bit, 48Khz
sound. Better still, get a card that can record 24 bit, 192Khz. This is a very
high end recording process that slower computers don't manage well, but it
leaves a tremendous amount of dynamic range available to the recording
engineer. Sorry folks, sound cards from CompUSA or Frye's just ain't gonna cut
it. Visit your local Guitar Center, Sam Ash, or B&H store to get the good
stuff. Prices on a good DAC start at around 300.00 and if you want a good
preamp built in, plan on spending more. The mid level cards are decent, and
usable for most things. In our facility, we usually use the John Hardy preamps
with the Echo Layla or the M-Audio Delta 1010, depending on what room
A good preamp will be capable of substantially increased gain without inducing noise to the output. This is critical. Listen to this through headphones. Pay serious attention to the amount of noise increase as you turn up the volume. This is where cheap $99.00 soundcards show their ugliness and the better cards start to shine. If you're serious about playing in this game, expect to spend a minimum of $500.00 to get the goods. Regardless of the software you use, you'll need a good
EQ, a good compressor, and a good maximizer at absolute minimum. Whether
you're using Vegas, Sound Forge, Final Cut Pro, Adobe Audition, Nuendo, Sonar,
or any other similar application, forget about the manufacturers installed
plugs if you're serious about audio. They simply won't work as well as tools
from iZotope or WAVES. My favorites are the WAVES Renaissance EQs and
UltraMaximizer for the Mac and PC, and I'm nearly as equally enamored with the
iZotope plugin suite from Ozone. The Sonic Timeworx plugs that are available
separately or bundled with Cakewalk Sonar are really sweet as well. I'm a huge
proponent of "invisible" EQ, that provide exceptionally smooth balance between
EQ points, and don't get brittle as the higher frequencies are pushed, and
don't become muddy as the lower frequencies are pushed or as the middle
frequencies are You'll usually want to use a rolloff with your voiceovers, rolling anything below 80Hz out of the mix and eliminating any rumble caused by any heavy equipment such as room vibration, furnace fans, etc. It also can help clean up a mix, and you may not even be able to hear what's down in that range, depending on your speaker monitoring system. Look at boosting lows in the 80-110Hz range for most voiceover work, and look at boosting some of the extreme frequencies in the 15KHz region if you'd like a breathy, airy sound. Otherwise, look more at frequencies in the 8KHz area to add a little bite to the vocal. Depending on the mic used and the techniques employed during the recording, you may not need to do any EQ at all, but generally a good V/O requires EQ of some sort or another.
Look to start vocal compression with a compression ratio of 2:1, using a soft knee, and fast attack time. There is a fine balance between having a too fast release time and having a too slow release time. If your plugin has auto-release time settings, you may want to use these. You may need to set a deeper compression ratio, depending on the voice and recording. Never go more than 8:1 with a voice-over, and even that is a fairly extreme setting. Be cautious of compressors set too high, or using auto-gain makeup. This can easily induce noise to the audio, or rather enhance existing noise in the recording. Of course, you can use a noise gate to "hide" the noise, but noise gates can also create more problems if the threshold is set too low or too high. Another couple of valuable tools for some types of V/O
styles is the BBE harmonic enhancer, or the WAVES L2 UltraMaximizer. (in this
authors opinion, every video editor should have the L2 UltraMaximizer anyway,
it's a HUGE benefit to any audio programming. The iZotope Ozone has a terrific
maximizer as well, although it's more musical than it is dialog oriented in
terms of how it's setup. The WAVES tool offers less control and is basically
"dummy-proof" whereas the Ozone tool can be controlled a little more
completely, and if you don't know what you're doing, you could create more
problems than you'll solve. Either way, use a maximizer of some sort to get
your final audio output to it's maximum level without being concerned about
distortion. With a little practice, you can easily create good voiceovers. More than anything, it boils down to the room, mic, soundcard, and your ears. Listen closely to radio voices, voice-overs on PBS documentaries, and movie trailers for ideas of how you want a voiceover to sound. Keep in mind that not everyone has a good voice for voiceover work. Practice might not make perfect, but it certainly can go a long distance when training your voice and ear for good voice over sound quality. Being a good narrator is difficult, just as it will take time for you to learn the tricks and techniques for getting the best settings and delivery for voiceover sound. These tips are mere starting points; keep working with the tools you have, or try demo versions of the tools listed in this article, and you'll quickly find how much more you can do with the voice.
|
|||
| More Tutorials from Douglas Spotted Eagle and VASST:. | |||
|
|
|
|
|